Well, you asked.
A small screen would be useful for:

– Exact parameter readout: Precise values instead of relying on knob position memory or a single digit alphanumeric display.
– Additional Device Reliance: Reduced need for external control devices: Lowers dependence on an iPad/app for editing and management.
– Preset management: Easier browsing, naming, and recall.
– Visual feedback: Clear confirmation of changes in real time.
– Hidden parameters access: Reduces reliance on shift functions or key combos.
– Modulation routing clarity: Helps avoid mistakes in complex setups.
– Diagnostics: Clear error or overload messages.
– Future-proofing: Allows added features without redesigning controls.

And at this price point, this is an awful omission.

It seems very user friendly to me, how would a small screen improve upon what is already there?

And thus why I said neither contribute to depth of sound! I was responding to the infomercial claim, at the very least this should have been 96kHz, and yes it makes a difference.

And thus why I said neither contribute to depth of sound! I was responding to the infomercial claim, at the very least this should have been 96kHz, and yes it makes a difference!

The purpose of 32-bit floating point isn’t „higher resolution“ or „depth“, but significantly more headroom, less rounding errors, and less quantization errors.

From what I’ve heard it’s the least intresting pedal I wanna throw 1k at. How’s this possible?

At $999, the value proposition is questionable, and a small hi-res OLED screen would have made this far more user friendly.