Suonobuono Polyvera Synthesizer Hands-On Review

In his latest loopop video, host Ziv Eliraz shares a hands-on review of the new Suonobuono Polyvera synthesizer.

The Polyvera is Suonobuono’s first synthesizer. It’s described as “a modern homage to the iconic wavetable synths and samplers of the early 80s”. It’s designed to combine the characteristic digital artifacts of that era with true analog multimode filters, for added warmth and versatility.

In the video, Eliraz offers an in-depth demo of the Polyvera and shares his takes the synth’s pros and cons.

Topics covered:

0:00 Intro
2:00 Overview
5:45 Workflow
7:55 Build
8:15 I/O
9:15 Osc dirt styles
10:45 Sub osc
11:45 Osc 2 samples
13:25 Loop points
15:15 Sample styles
15:35 Sample shape
16:25 FM w/samples
19:15 Ring mod
19:45 Sync & noise
20:05 Filter
22:30 Clipping
23:45 Overdrive
25:30 Filter env
26:25 Effects
29:10 Reverbs
30:40 Modulation
33:00 LFOs
34:20 Arp
34:50 Sequencer
36:00 Voicing
37:10 Pros & cons
40:00 Preset sounds!

Check out the video and share your thoughts on the Polyvera in the comments!

4 thoughts on “Suonobuono Polyvera Synthesizer Hands-On Review

  1. I am curious why this article includes the YouTuber’s full real name, along with their username, when it is not standard practice for public figures and adds nothing to the story. The inclusion of this detail seems entirely unnecessary and raises questions about the writer’s motives, especially given the political context. This is a clear overstep that seems to serve no purpose other than to highlight a personal background that has nothing to do with the content of the article. This is not journalism; this is foul play, and I hope this news outlet cleans up their act by removing the name immediately.

    1. Gatekeeper – your comment is a little bizarre.

      Naming sources is standard practice. Using unnamed sources should be a last resort. We credit the the person behind reviews and Youtube videos, wherever possible.

      We will respect creator’s preferences, though, if they prefer to not be credited by name.

      The only person that’s asked for this has been ‘Suit and Tie Guy’. That’s his professional identity, so that’s what we use.

  2. “We will respect creator’s preferences, though, if they prefer to not be credited by name.” And did you ask him? Before you published the article with his full name, that is.

    1. Dude.., seriously, stop. You’re really out in left field and making yourself look ugly. Im sure they know what they are doing… more so than you. Who are You to question how things are done. ????.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *